Thanks for coming up with a (what seems at first) great idea.
The unfortunate thing is as what jawaface has pointed out - the main thing, being people getting upset and taking things in to their own hands.
ultimately, there will be numerous complaints and people taking things too far.
But I do ...
Search found 20 matches
- Fri May 09, 2025 8:02 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Proposal for Legalizing Plundering in Server 54
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6861
- Mon Apr 28, 2025 12:12 am
- Forum: Battle Events
- Topic: S54 v S55 - wrap up
- Replies: 1
- Views: 487
Re: S54 v S55 - wrap up
And at the end, it looked like this;
- Mon Apr 28, 2025 12:05 am
- Forum: Battle Events
- Topic: S54 v S55 - wrap up
- Replies: 1
- Views: 487
S54 v S55 - wrap up
screenshots of the event
- Sun Apr 20, 2025 10:24 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Adding screenshots via phone
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7654
Re: Adding screenshots via phone
done - hopefully 2MB is enough? I can make it bigger if needed.
- Sun Apr 20, 2025 10:23 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Adding screenshots via phone
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7654
Re: Adding screenshots via phone
sorry, didnt realise there was a limit - will look into it and fix if i can
- Sun Apr 20, 2025 10:20 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Reflection on Server 54's Rules and Dynamics
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1865
Re: Reflection on Server 54's Rules and Dynamics
hey,
1) the 1st attack on UN3, was because the leader insulted 1st and basically taunted them into doing it...
Overkill? I dont know - but people with attitude need to learn that words can result into action.
2) The actions of Sin are unique. Dont be disheartened about the progress we've made as a ...
1) the 1st attack on UN3, was because the leader insulted 1st and basically taunted them into doing it...
Overkill? I dont know - but people with attitude need to learn that words can result into action.
2) The actions of Sin are unique. Dont be disheartened about the progress we've made as a ...
- Tue Apr 15, 2025 6:26 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Outlaw rule discussion
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3485
Outlaw rule discussion
viewtopic.php?p=99
This thread is for discussing and formalizing the OUTLAW RULE - before being voted on.
This thread is for discussing and formalizing the OUTLAW RULE - before being voted on.
- Tue Apr 15, 2025 6:25 pm
- Forum: Announcements and Rules of conduct
- Topic: Outlaw Rule
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2956
Outlaw Rule
STATUS = Still to be voted on. And formalized.
Description of 'Outlaw Rule':
In an effort to have an ultimate method of enforcement, an 'Outlaw' (which is listed on the forum's 'Most Wanted' list - TBD) - is a player that is defined as someone that repeatedly offends/breaks the rules of governance ...
Description of 'Outlaw Rule':
In an effort to have an ultimate method of enforcement, an 'Outlaw' (which is listed on the forum's 'Most Wanted' list - TBD) - is a player that is defined as someone that repeatedly offends/breaks the rules of governance ...
- Tue Apr 15, 2025 5:40 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Looting rule discussion
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2840
Looting rule discussion
viewtopic.php?t=35
This topic is here for the discussion of the looting rule, before voting on the rule.
This topic is here for the discussion of the looting rule, before voting on the rule.
- Tue Apr 15, 2025 5:39 pm
- Forum: Announcements and Rules of conduct
- Topic: Looting/Plundering
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1615
Looting/Plundering
STATUS = ACTIVE
VOTING resolution date 15/04/2025.
ALLIANCES WITH NO CITY:
This means alliances that do not have a city of any level, are open targets for looting.
Separate to the above, there are also discussions to include special 'affiliate' alliances, where they are created for the sole ...
VOTING resolution date 15/04/2025.
ALLIANCES WITH NO CITY:
This means alliances that do not have a city of any level, are open targets for looting.
Separate to the above, there are also discussions to include special 'affiliate' alliances, where they are created for the sole ...